Fish legal v information commissioner
WebThese pleadings, and the counter pleadings, being duly heard, the very learned judge in set terms decided, to wit, --That as for the boat, he awarded it to the plaintiffs, because they … WebThe Upper Tribunal has recently handed down judgment in Fish Legal v Information Commissioner, determining that privatised water companies are public authorities within …
Fish legal v information commissioner
Did you know?
WebCase C-279/12: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Upper Tribunal — United Kingdom) — Fish Legal, Emily Shirley v Information Commissioner, United Utilities Water plc, Yorkshire Water Services Ltd, Southern Water Services Ltd (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Aarhus … WebOct 22, 2024 · In his decision in NAMA, O'Donnell J. applied the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Fish Legal and Emily Shirley v Information Commissioner and Others (C-279/12) (Fish Legal EU), available at www.curia.europa.eu, which considered the meaning of “public authority” and, in particular, its meaning under …
WebLegal settlements are often substantial amounts because they need to cover your long-term needs. Don’t delay, contact us today on 0345 357 9000 or email us or simply complete … WebIt added that the CJEU judgment in Case C-279/12 (Fish Legal & Emily Shirley v. Information Commissioner, United Utilities Water Plc, Yorkshire Water and Services Ltd and Southern Water Services Ltd) (Fish Legal) is not determinative in this case. It said that, in that case, the CJEU did not consider the status of a subsidiary, joint venture or ...
WebFish Legal v. Information Commissioner. Region and Country: Western Europe, United Kingdom. Year: 2013. ... commercial entity is considered a “public authority” for the purposes of environmental information regulations if the entity does not determine in a genuinely autonomous manner the way in which it provides services. Gauri Maulekhi v. ... WebAug 31, 2024 · The FTT’s judgment reiterates the dual test for determining what is a public authority under regulation 2(2)(c) of the EIR, derived from two previous Upper Tribunal decisions in Fish Legal and Cross v …
WebApr 13, 2015 · The UK’s Upper Tribunal (“UT“) has ruled in Fish Legal v Information Commission and others that privatised water utility companies in England and Wales are considered to be “public ...
simon thraneWebApr 13, 2015 · The UK’s Upper Tribunal (“ UT “) has ruled in Fish Legal v Information Commission and others that privatised water utility companies in England and Wales are considered to be “public ... simon thorstenWebMay 21, 2012 · The following questions are referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling: 1. In considering whether a natural or legal person is one … simon thravesWebAug 31, 2024 · There was not an equivalent provision to section 6 of the Water Industry Act 1991, which was considered by the Upper Tribunal in Fish Legal v Information Commissioner [2014] UKUT 52, where a group ... simon thoughtWeb[2016] AACR 39 (Cross v IC) 4 a directions hearing on 2 June 2014, it was re-introduced until after the UT’s own judgment in Fish Legal on whether the water companies were public authorities for the purposes of the EIR. The UT’s judgment was promulgated on 16 February 2015 and is reported as Fish Legal and Shirley v Information Commissioner and ors … simon threadgoldWebApr 16, 2015 · Fish Legal v Information Commissioner and others (Information rights practice and procedure) [2015] UKUT 52 (AAC) Charles J – read judgment Water and sewage utility companies are “public … simon threadgill dentistWebIn Case C-279/12 Fish Legal & Emily Shirley v The Information Commissioner,11 the question was whether that definition of a public authority encompassed two pri-vatised water companies. An individual and an NGO had requested information from United Utilities Water plc and Yorkshire Water Services Ltd regarding dis- simon three js